Settlement agreement for the division of marital property in court

During the trial, conditions may be created under which the disputing parties can come to a compromise regarding the stated differences. The consideration of the case will end with the conclusion of a settlement agreement and approval of its provisions by the presiding judge. An appropriate determination is made regarding the acceptance of the settlement agreement. You can view a sample settlement agreement here.

What is a settlement agreement?

A settlement agreement is a document approved by the presiding judge in the framework of a civil process, in which each of the parties to the dispute assumes the rights and obligations to resolve the dispute in question out of court.

The settlement agreement has the legal nature of a operative decision on the dispute. The obligations assumed under it are binding. In the event of a violation by one of the parties of its obligations, the party guilty of the violation will be forced to perform execution by the bailiff service on the basis of a writ of execution issued by the court.

By its legal nature, a settlement agreement represents a contract between the parties. The text of this agreement provides for the rights and obligations of the parties, as well as sanctions for violation of their obligations.

Civil legislation is based on the principles of equality of parties. And the judicial system considers it right that the parties will be able to independently understand the circumstances that have arisen. The presiding officer, explaining the rights of the participants in the process, will certainly try to direct the plaintiff and defendant towards reconciliation.

After concluding a settlement agreement, the parties do not have the right to again bring forward claims on the same grounds as specified in the statement of claim. Agreements can be considered in accordance with the requirements stated in the statement of claim. They may be supplemented by circumstances relevant to the case under consideration, but should not go beyond these limits. If the subject of the dispute is debt obligations under a specific agreement, then the scope of this agreement should be described in the agreement. Requirements under other agreements are not included in the settlement agreement.

In the final determination, the court has the right to refuse the parties to enter into a settlement agreement if it contradicts the interests of legality or violates the rights of third parties. Such refusals are often found in family disputes between former spouses regarding the maintenance of a common child or disputes about the right to inheritance. For example, the law sets the minimum amount of alimony obligations at 25 percent of the spouse's income. At the same time, the participants agreed to reduce this share to 15 percent. The court will refuse to approve the settlement agreement, since this directly contradicts the interests of the minor.

Without court approval, the settlement agreement is not considered concluded.

Before agreeing to conclude such a document, you should carefully think about the feasibility and real possibility of the parties fulfilling their obligations. For example, if the defendant has assumed debt obligations and does not fulfill them for several years, it is unlikely that he will fulfill the settlement agreement in accordance with the obligations assumed.

What law is it provided for?

The right to conclude a settlement agreement is provided for participants in civil proceedings in the provisions of Article 173 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. These provisions are disclosed in detail in Chapter 14.1 of the legislative act. These additions were adopted on the basis of Federal Law No. 197-FZ of July 26, 2021.

Additional provisions are contained in the Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings”.

Notarization of settlement agreements will reduce the number of appeals to court

Some spot amendments can be made even in the interval between the second and third readings of the bill. That is why we believe that there is no need to wait for the adoption of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to continue the work. If the Civil Code of the Russian Federation contains provisions that determine the demand for notaries in the field of civil transactions, in corporate legal relations, and in other aspects of activity, then we will not only have to spell out all these functions in our bill, but also prepare the notary corps for these responsibilities. What do you think is the role of a notary in modern society? In the draft federal law on notaries, we provide for major changes in the regulation of the activities of the Russian notary corps.

I mean strengthening state control, introducing various types of notary responsibilities, changing the admission scheme to the profession, using systemic vocational training, and defining age criteria. At the moment, a huge layer of requirements has been formulated that will form the basis for strengthening personnel policies, professional training and professional suitability. There is another important point, which, unfortunately, cannot be written down in the law - this is moral suitability. A thought that I have been pursuing for a long time and everywhere: the moral position, internal culture, and upbringing of a notary are an integral part of his activity. A lawyer without an idea, without an ideology, is not a lawyer. The qualities inherent in our profession should be developed from the student’s bench.

USEFUL INFORMATION: Is it possible to apply for alimony retroactively?

How to conclude a settlement agreement?

After receiving agreements between the parties, they are included in the draft settlement agreement in writing. The participant in the process or his representative submits the finished document for consideration to the judge who presides over the process. After reading the text of the agreement, the judge makes a ruling.

The settlement agreement may apply to part of the claims presented. In this case, the agreement must be accepted in full. The law does not allow partial acceptance of agreements. The judge has the right, after studying the text of the document, to demand the removal of paragraphs that do not comply with the requirements of the law.

There is no unified form provided. Correct writing of the text is important from the point of view of equality of parties and the rule of law.

When is it impossible to conclude a settlement agreement?

Peace cannot be concluded in cases where the scope of the rights and obligations of one of the parties is determined by the norms of legislative acts. And the wording of the agreement contradicts the specified standards. In particular, when determining the volume of alimony obligations or allocating a mandatory share to heirs (consultation with a lawyer on inheritance).

It is prohibited to make peace in labor disputes when the subject of the proceedings is arrears of wages. Labor disputes also include the process of compensation for harm caused to the health of an employee. The regulation of such a dispute relates to a normative act. Dispositive regulation is not provided in order to prevent pressure from the employer, as the most financially protected party.

The agreement is not regulated within the framework of an administrative litigation with government agencies. In particular, when challenging the decision of a particular official or collegial body. Also, when challenging an adopted normative act. In particular, in legal disputes with the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation on the assignment or refusal to assign a pension to a person who receives status ahead of schedule on the basis of the provisions of labor legislation on heavy or mixed labor.

The reconciliation procedure cannot be performed within the framework of a special proceeding case. Such cases include:

  • adoption cases;
  • on recognizing a citizen as missing;
  • on declaring a citizen dead;
  • on limiting the legal capacity of a citizen;
  • to challenge the action or inaction of an official;
  • on termination of a citizen’s legal capacity;
  • about forced hospitalization;
  • about compulsory treatment;
  • on amendments to civil status acts;
  • about disputes related to notarial actions.

Provisions on settlement agreements are very rarely applied in cases in which there is no material component of the dispute.

Also, a settlement agreement cannot be accepted if the parties do not have a common opinion regarding the specific provisions of the document submitted to the court.

Advantages of property agreements with a notary

In conclusion, we note that any divorce will be much easier and safer if the property is divided before the trial. By notarizing a document, you can get the following benefits:

  • Less psychological pressure as there is no trial status.
  • There is no risk that the judge will disagree with the proposed option, which could cause the interests of both parties to suffer during judicial division.
  • Availability of legal and technical support from a notary in the process of preparing and signing a document. In particular, the notary certifies that the text complies with the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Therefore, if life has turned out in such a way that it is necessary to dissolve the marriage, the optimal solution would be to make an amicable decision on property without bringing the matter to court.

Download the form for a settlement agreement on the division of property.

Who can sign a settlement agreement?

The participants in the process appearing in it have the right to sign the document personally or through a representative if the power of attorney directly contains this authority.

The main participants in the process are the plaintiff and the defendant in the dispute under consideration. Third parties who make independent claims must also sign the settlement agreement and participate in the negotiation of terms. Third parties, without independent demands, participate in concluding an agreement if the rights and obligations provided for in the document affect their interests.

At what stage can a settlement agreement be concluded?

The conclusion of a settlement agreement is possible at any stage of the process. The trial is divided into periods:

  • Acceptance of the case for proceedings;
  • Preparing for the hearing;
  • Direct examination in the courtroom;
  • Court of Appeal;
  • Cassation authority.

After the final decision on the case is made and the decision enters into legal force, the possibility of concluding a settlement agreement remains limited. By virtue of the provisions of Article 439 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the claimant has the right to refuse collection for certain reasons. Thus, enforcement proceedings are terminated and cannot be resumed again on the same grounds.

Is it possible to appeal?

To appeal the settlement agreement, 15 days are provided from the date of the court’s decision on acceptance. In practice, this happens extremely rarely, since most often the parties are well aware of the consequences of making peace within the framework of the trial.

However, if one of the parties made peace under the influence of a mistake or as a result of deception, then it has the opportunity to challenge the determination of the acceptance of the settlement agreement.

Is the government coming back? duty?

There is no refund of state duty. There is an option to distribute legal costs between the parties to the settlement agreement. The state fee is paid into the budget before the start of the trial to cover the court's expenses for considering a particular case. The conclusion of peace is considered the logical and correct conclusion of the legal process, which is equivalent to a court decision.

Is it possible to challenge a property division agreement?

If your agreement was not approved in court, then it is contested, changed and terminated, like any contract. If your settlement agreement is approved by a court ruling, then you can change it in some cases also in court (I won’t write in which ones, it’s long), or argue about the failure of the other party to fulfill the terms of the settlement agreement.

Tell me, is it possible to challenge a contract for the transfer of gifted property if all the documents are in the hands of the gifted person..?? Lawyers' Answers: Yes. To do this, attach to your claim a request for evidence indicating why you cannot present it yourself. If this is real estate, then you can independently obtain copies and duplicates of documents from Rosreestr.

If there are legal grounds for this, very much so.

But it occurs very often. 2.

Everything that you bought from the first day after receiving the marriage certificate from the registry office until the day you received the divorce certificate from the registry office, if there were no marriage contracts and agreements on the division of property, will be divided during a divorce according to the general rule of 50/50. 3.

Of course, you can register it for a relative who writes a will for you, dies, his will is declared invalid and you will not receive anything, or the relative will become worse than your spouse - this is the last case from my practice. 4.

How to challenge a property division agreement

It is obvious that the indicated grounds for canceling the donation are in the moral and ethical sphere of relations. Thirdly, the gift agreement may stipulate the donor’s right to cancel the gift if he survives the donee.

The specified ground for cancellation of a gift is applicable only if there is a provision in the gift agreement regarding the corresponding right of the donor. Consequently, if a gift agreement is made by transferring a gift to the donee, such a donation cannot be canceled on this basis.

Fourthly, at the request of an interested person, the court may cancel a donation made by an individual entrepreneur or legal entity in violation of the provisions of the Insolvency (Bankruptcy) Law at the expense of funds associated with his business activities within six months preceding the declaration of such a person as insolvent (bankrupt). ) (clause 3 of article 578 of the Civil Code).

Settlement agreement on the division of marital property after divorce: sample document

Anything can be challenged, but I have not yet seen cases where someone managed to challenge a well-drafted marriage contract. And you can sue from 1 to 5.7 years. Many people do just that.

Spend a lot of money on a lawyer and your own health. 5. What to do? You and your wife need to visit a GOOD lawyer and notary in your region.

Remember! That the marriage contract has the force of a writ of execution and the court is more likely to take it into account and not other arguments! It is better to conclude both a marriage contract and an agreement on the division of property at the same time in order to avoid hysterics, scandals and other events. 6.

USEFUL INFORMATION: How to apply for alimony and find out the debt through the State Services portal

So that you are completely savvy in this matter and do not break your head, I will now send samples of these documents to you as an example. And you look and decide what to do next. lawyer in business, candidate of legal sciences, Zinkovsky M. A. (Belgorod).

Is it possible to challenge an agreement on the division of property?

But in your case, the property belonging to the testator was donated by him, therefore, only by challenging the deed of gift can you have the right to something Donated, there is no such concept in Mother Russ now, there is a gift agreement. If the transfer of ownership under this agreement is registered in the prescribed manner, then it can be challenged only on the grounds established by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

The deed of gift will no longer be included in the estate. What kind of inheritance are we talking about, if before her death it was given to her daughter, now only she is its owner and this property will be hereditary only after her death, God forbid, of course, in social services.

What happens if the debtor does not comply with the settlement agreement?

If one party fails to fulfill obligations assumed on the basis of the peace document, the other party has the right to apply to the court for the issuance of a writ of execution for forced execution by the Federal Bailiff Service.

The corresponding application is submitted to the reception room of the court, which considered the case and approved the settlement agreement. The claimant may ask the court to independently send a writ of execution to the FSSP or hand it over to the claimant for self-filing.

Sign up for a consultation

What is this agreement?

In essence, this is an ordinary civil law contract. All requirements and provisions of the Civil Code regarding transactions and their consequences apply to him. In addition, it has the force of a court decision. The text of the settlement agreement should definitely define the procedure for reimbursement of legal costs - services of lawyers, advocates, examinations and other costs associated with conducting the case in court. Otherwise, the judge will distribute these costs at his own discretion.

If the plaintiff represents his interests independently and does not have sufficient legal training, the opponent may offer the following: abandon the claim before concluding a settlement agreement. It must be remembered: abandoning the claim and concluding a settlement agreement are two unrelated procedural actions. If you refuse the claim, you are deprived of the right to re-apply to the court on the same grounds against the same defendant (subparagraph 2, paragraph 1, article 134 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation).

Rating
( 2 ratings, average 5 out of 5 )
Did you like the article? Share with friends:
Для любых предложений по сайту: [email protected]